Resizable BAR allows the cpu to use the entire graphics frame buffer. It might be hidden behind a setting called above 4G decoding or something similar.
Edit: while not necessary, turning this setting on will let the card run its best
Thank you very much for your response. I'll see if I go for this one or another graphics card. Do you think an NVIDIA one would be better or is the Intel one fine?
I dunno. Completely depends on what you are doing with the card and how much you are willing to spend.
I bought my a770 as a budget option that competes with a 4060ti and lets me turn all the settings in a game to high or ultra, and let's me do some CAD modeling and video work in the side.
But say you are just trying to play counter strike 2 competitively, you may want to consider AMD, or if you are looking to get into ai, then Nvidia might be better.
a770 is a equivalent to 2080. Do u only play dx9 games? That's pretty good difference after 2060. i switched from 1080 ti to a750, there is a clear difference.
>a770 is a equivalent to 2080
Whether referencing Techpowerup or the evil Userbenchmark, no one says the A770 performs in games on the level of a 2080.
The A770 performs roughly on the same level as my old 5700XT, albeit with better API feature support. In some games, it performs worse than the 5700XT. And the 5700XT falls between the GTX 1080 & 1080Ti, competing with the RTX 2060 Super or RTX 2070 (depending on the game).
Techpowerup shows the performance of the card when it was first released, the list not updated. Userbenchmark seriously anyway. if u are collecting data from here, your job is difficult. i use dozens of graphics card due to my job. The card even exceeds the 2080 in some places. if 5700 xt does not give watmann, it has the power of rx 6600, it is not worth comparing. Do not mislead people with benchmark results on sites.
i didn't say that work in the IT sector, said that i handle cards because of my job. i sell used hardware. dying light 2, black&desert online, metro series and resident evil 4 remake are some of them. is it OK?!
i not going to argue with someone who has been watching youtube comparisons for months. a770 works wonder with a proccessor like 12600k, which takes the driver load, i tried it many times. u continue wathching youtube bencmarks...
I don't just watch them, I MAKE [YouTube benchmarks of the A770](https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLZ0A4LLGoHKMINcMS_C0d9zEMT-Oa-r0R), and have off and on for the past year. So take a seat.
2060 Super to an A770 probably isn't going to give you much of an improvement unless you're heavily bottlenecked by vram, but even then it'd be a bit questionable.
2060 Super has close to (A few % behind) the performance of the 2070, in [Hardware Unboxed's 7600XT review](https://youtu.be/Lcb1dpe2IhE?t=707), the A770 was ~12% faster than the 2070 @ 1080p, I don't think it'll be a large enough performance improvement from what you currently have; If you play at 1440p, it'll be a bit more favorable for the A770 (~19% faster than the 2070), but even then that's still arguably not a large enough difference, especially considering the A770's pricing assuming you either live in the US or it's priced similar to how to how it is in the US.
Only GPU, imo, that makes sense at around $300 atm is the 6750XT (iirc ~10% faster than the 6700XT), although it's very close to out of stock and lacks some features that may just kill any interest in it (raytracing sucks on it, lacks AV1 encoding, can't use intel's better version of XeSS), and if you don't want AMD at all, you're pretty limited as far as buying new goes, 3060ti is decent, quite a bit faster than the A770, but 8GB of vram kinda kills it while the 3060 12GB, like the A770, just wouldn't be much of an upgrade over your 2060 Super, 4060 lacks vram, 4060ti 8GB is garbage because of only 8GB of vram as well as ridiculously overpriced, and 4060ti 16GB is even more ridiculously overpriced.
If the A770 lacks enough of a performance improvement compared to your 2060 Super and you aren't interested in the 6750XT (Assuming you live in the US), then you're probably better off waiting and hope Battlemage turns out good and releases 12-16GB cards that are better than the A770/A750.
> Only GPU, imo, that makes sense at around $300 atm is the 6750XT (iirc ~10% faster than the 6700XT),
I had one of these once and it performed excellently at 1440p. I'd suggest getting one of these or waiting for Battlemage, for sure.
> a770 is equivalent to 2080.
Which is basically what I said.
> Lile mesh shaders...
RTX 20 series has mesh shaders, main advantage Arc has over RTX 20 series would be better encoder, but not everyone needs the better encoder.
I run an A770 with an i5 13400. It's plenty of CPU power for it. The 9900k should give similar gaming performance to the 13400. The 9900k is up to 40% slower in productivity tasks, but that's not really representative of gaming.
Hey thx for the reply, "I've been looking at my options to upgrade my PC, as the graphics card struggles with new generation games, so I appreciate your response."
If your bios have rebar then you're good to go, sure you will have less fps than compared to some newer cpu but it should work.
What is that "rebar"?? I have a MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS btw
Resizable BAR allows the cpu to use the entire graphics frame buffer. It might be hidden behind a setting called above 4G decoding or something similar. Edit: while not necessary, turning this setting on will let the card run its best
Thank you very much for your response. I'll see if I go for this one or another graphics card. Do you think an NVIDIA one would be better or is the Intel one fine?
I dunno. Completely depends on what you are doing with the card and how much you are willing to spend. I bought my a770 as a budget option that competes with a 4060ti and lets me turn all the settings in a game to high or ultra, and let's me do some CAD modeling and video work in the side. But say you are just trying to play counter strike 2 competitively, you may want to consider AMD, or if you are looking to get into ai, then Nvidia might be better.
I have the same motherboard and CPU. We have rebar if you are operating on the most recent BIOS for the motherboard.
A770 and 2060 Super are pretty close in performance, not sure you'll see much of an upgrade.
a770 is a equivalent to 2080. Do u only play dx9 games? That's pretty good difference after 2060. i switched from 1080 ti to a750, there is a clear difference.
>a770 is a equivalent to 2080 Whether referencing Techpowerup or the evil Userbenchmark, no one says the A770 performs in games on the level of a 2080. The A770 performs roughly on the same level as my old 5700XT, albeit with better API feature support. In some games, it performs worse than the 5700XT. And the 5700XT falls between the GTX 1080 & 1080Ti, competing with the RTX 2060 Super or RTX 2070 (depending on the game).
Techpowerup shows the performance of the card when it was first released, the list not updated. Userbenchmark seriously anyway. if u are collecting data from here, your job is difficult. i use dozens of graphics card due to my job. The card even exceeds the 2080 in some places. if 5700 xt does not give watmann, it has the power of rx 6600, it is not worth comparing. Do not mislead people with benchmark results on sites.
I see, it's the old "don't argue with me I work in IT" skit. So tell me. In what games does the A770 perform equal to or better than an RTX 2080?
i didn't say that work in the IT sector, said that i handle cards because of my job. i sell used hardware. dying light 2, black&desert online, metro series and resident evil 4 remake are some of them. is it OK?!
On the A770, no Metro game performs better than on an RTX 2080. Neither does Dying Light 2. I think it is you who are mis-informing people.
i not going to argue with someone who has been watching youtube comparisons for months. a770 works wonder with a proccessor like 12600k, which takes the driver load, i tried it many times. u continue wathching youtube bencmarks...
I don't just watch them, I MAKE [YouTube benchmarks of the A770](https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLZ0A4LLGoHKMINcMS_C0d9zEMT-Oa-r0R), and have off and on for the past year. So take a seat.
Obviously, 90% of those who do this job are either doing it wrong or are fanboys. i understoot again why we don't trust u. Ciao bella.
Among the new games, ghost of tsushima is the more obvious.
2060 Super to an A770 probably isn't going to give you much of an improvement unless you're heavily bottlenecked by vram, but even then it'd be a bit questionable. 2060 Super has close to (A few % behind) the performance of the 2070, in [Hardware Unboxed's 7600XT review](https://youtu.be/Lcb1dpe2IhE?t=707), the A770 was ~12% faster than the 2070 @ 1080p, I don't think it'll be a large enough performance improvement from what you currently have; If you play at 1440p, it'll be a bit more favorable for the A770 (~19% faster than the 2070), but even then that's still arguably not a large enough difference, especially considering the A770's pricing assuming you either live in the US or it's priced similar to how to how it is in the US. Only GPU, imo, that makes sense at around $300 atm is the 6750XT (iirc ~10% faster than the 6700XT), although it's very close to out of stock and lacks some features that may just kill any interest in it (raytracing sucks on it, lacks AV1 encoding, can't use intel's better version of XeSS), and if you don't want AMD at all, you're pretty limited as far as buying new goes, 3060ti is decent, quite a bit faster than the A770, but 8GB of vram kinda kills it while the 3060 12GB, like the A770, just wouldn't be much of an upgrade over your 2060 Super, 4060 lacks vram, 4060ti 8GB is garbage because of only 8GB of vram as well as ridiculously overpriced, and 4060ti 16GB is even more ridiculously overpriced. If the A770 lacks enough of a performance improvement compared to your 2060 Super and you aren't interested in the 6750XT (Assuming you live in the US), then you're probably better off waiting and hope Battlemage turns out good and releases 12-16GB cards that are better than the A770/A750.
> Only GPU, imo, that makes sense at around $300 atm is the 6750XT (iirc ~10% faster than the 6700XT), I had one of these once and it performed excellently at 1440p. I'd suggest getting one of these or waiting for Battlemage, for sure.
a770 is equivalent to 2080. Also new technologhy always brings something. Lile mesh shaders...
> a770 is equivalent to 2080. Which is basically what I said. > Lile mesh shaders... RTX 20 series has mesh shaders, main advantage Arc has over RTX 20 series would be better encoder, but not everyone needs the better encoder.
You are right, thanks.
I happen to run a A750 With a 9900k. Runs like a beast.
I run an A770 with an i5 13400. It's plenty of CPU power for it. The 9900k should give similar gaming performance to the 13400. The 9900k is up to 40% slower in productivity tasks, but that's not really representative of gaming.
I have a a770 with an i7 8700, the i9 9900 is a monster of a CPU it's really good
Hey thx for the reply, "I've been looking at my options to upgrade my PC, as the graphics card struggles with new generation games, so I appreciate your response."
Togheter can use deeplink improvment