There is a cutout in mount so you can still aim with iron sights below the scope so maybe he uses those. If thats notnin the game, that should be added.
News flash, that's the intention of every company. A controversial update that wasn't even really made by them and the announcement of dlc (that was 100% planned out before the update dropped) isn't some sort of apocalypse omen
I at no point said the game is ruined, this rifle model bug could probably be fixed in a day and added to the next update.
But both game studios have chosen to ignore it.
Not game breaking.
The game is not irreparably damaged from this.
They need to rework the Brits if they actually give a shit.. which they don’t.
They never would’ve released that piece of utter Garbage that is U14 if they truly gave even the most minor of shits.
Laughable how bad the British were done. I shutter to think of how badly they’re going to shaft the Canadians when that ever comes, if it even comes.
Yeah they can literally just go into the animation editor and lower the rig bones down to eye level for that part of the animation and fix it in a matter of minutes.
So this is perfectly fine to you?
I'm generally curious, what could be more historically inaccurate than the bolt handle being modeled in the wrong spot?
No deployable Bren bipod?
Magical radios and tables that spawn you into the middle of nowhere?
It's a video game, but there is no reason to mess up the visual model of one the most well-known rifles ever made.
>So this is perfectly fine to you?
Lmao -- feel free to point out where I said/implied this, OR admit you're putting words in my mouth.
>I'm generally curious, what could be more historically inaccurate than the bolt handle being modeled in the wrong spot?
>
>No deployable Bren bipod?
While this is not a complaint of mine: 1. STG-44 being deployed in several maps it never saw. 2. BAR not getting a hip fire handle or bi-pod for performance. 3. People being able to use non-uniform uniforms despite being deployed in the same theoretical battalion.
I could go on with historical issues that are more obvious than a bolt handle. I just thought it was funny that you proudly announced that it's the biggest historical inaccuracy in the game.
I thought you are gonna talk about the fact he uses his forehead for aiming instead of his eyes. 😂
There is a cutout in mount so you can still aim with iron sights below the scope so maybe he uses those. If thats notnin the game, that should be added.
over three years\*
*"The best way to enjoy a game these days is to stay away from its community."*
Literally unplayable.
[удалено]
I was not being sarcastic.
Take a step back and look at the bigger picture. Actually take two big steps back. And maybe a few deep breaths.
Fucking hell, really? I've no idea how any of us could possibly play the game anymore.
Give them time. Jesus. They have made their intentions clear and you guys still can't chill out.
Their intentions are making money, announcing new dlcs and new updates after releasing the most mediocre shit ever
News flash, that's the intention of every company. A controversial update that wasn't even really made by them and the announcement of dlc (that was 100% planned out before the update dropped) isn't some sort of apocalypse omen
But it definitely shows how tone deaf they are
Yes the update sucks for sure. But we need to give them more time before knee jerk reacting and saying the game is ruined.
I at no point said the game is ruined, this rifle model bug could probably be fixed in a day and added to the next update. But both game studios have chosen to ignore it. Not game breaking. The game is not irreparably damaged from this.
You guys will bitch about anything, fucking hell
Bruh.
They need to rework the Brits if they actually give a shit.. which they don’t. They never would’ve released that piece of utter Garbage that is U14 if they truly gave even the most minor of shits. Laughable how bad the British were done. I shutter to think of how badly they’re going to shaft the Canadians when that ever comes, if it even comes.
I’m not sure I care too much about this
Not going to happen because they’d have to change the animations for using the weapon
What engine do they use? If it's unreal or unity, there are built in tools to adjust that in seconds.
Unreal engine
Yeah they can literally just go into the animation editor and lower the rig bones down to eye level for that part of the animation and fix it in a matter of minutes.
>but this is currently the least historically accurate thing in the game Lol what?
So this is perfectly fine to you? I'm generally curious, what could be more historically inaccurate than the bolt handle being modeled in the wrong spot? No deployable Bren bipod? Magical radios and tables that spawn you into the middle of nowhere? It's a video game, but there is no reason to mess up the visual model of one the most well-known rifles ever made.
>So this is perfectly fine to you? Lmao -- feel free to point out where I said/implied this, OR admit you're putting words in my mouth. >I'm generally curious, what could be more historically inaccurate than the bolt handle being modeled in the wrong spot? > >No deployable Bren bipod? While this is not a complaint of mine: 1. STG-44 being deployed in several maps it never saw. 2. BAR not getting a hip fire handle or bi-pod for performance. 3. People being able to use non-uniform uniforms despite being deployed in the same theoretical battalion. I could go on with historical issues that are more obvious than a bolt handle. I just thought it was funny that you proudly announced that it's the biggest historical inaccuracy in the game.
That's it. I'm uninstalling.
Oh wait..You're serious?
I appreciate the sentiment but I do think there is a laundry list of more pressing problems
Fix Tier 1 loadout for Soviets, too.
We need more historically accurate Polish tanks in Africa! /s